Ausgabe
2-2009
Themenschwerpunkt:
Internationale Gemeinschaft – Rhetorik und Realität
International Community – Rhetoric and Reality

INHALT
Editorial | download
full article as pdf
Seite III
Themenschwerpunkt:
Internationale Gemeinschaft – Rhetorik und Realität
International Community – Rhetoric and Reality
Beiträge aus Sicherheitspolitik und Friedensforschung
Neuerscheinung
Seite 121
Annotationen | download
full article as pdf
Seite 122
Besprechungen | download
full article as pdf
Seite 124

ENGLISH ABSTRACTS
The “International Community” – Rhetoric or Reality?
Tracing a seemingly well-known apparition
Berit Bliesemann de Guevara and Florian P. Kühn
The term “International Community” is commonly understood to refer either
to the norms of international policy or to a coalition of concerned actors.
However, in this article, we argue that it is the interplay of the term’s
image and the practice of its invocation that shapes its character. It
can be used by many different groups, state and non-state alike, to locate
their political goals in the context of a wider array of values. Usually
these norms are state-related and can be used to simulate political relevance.
Conversely, actors defying widely accepted values can be excluded and
policies against them legitimized. Addressing domestic as well as international
audiences, the claim to be acting as or on behalf of the “International
Community” is mostly rhetorical but has very real political consequences. download full
article as pdf
Reconstructing Afghanistan:
Is the West’ eclipsing the ‘International Community’?
Eva Gross
This article considers the role of the ‘international community’ in the
reconstruction of Afghanistan. Although the UN has a coordinating and
legitimizing role, the ‘international community’ has turned out to be
fragmented, and the countries determining policy have predominantly been
Western. Current efforts to include regional contributions do not necessarily
reflect a more inclusive notion of ‘the international community’. Rather
than re-investing in the notion of the international community to reach
a local, regional as well as international consensus, current thinking
on Afghanistan tends to highlight fragmentation of what was initially
framed as a task for the international community.
On the Fringes of the International Community:
The Making and Survival of “Rogue States”
Martin Beck and Johannes Gerschewski
Studies on “rogue states” often present normative analyses focused on
the perspective of Western actors. From a purely analytical point of view,
the present article steps away from this tradition and aims to examine
the process of designating actors as “rogue states”, its impact on them,
and their capabilities to defy stigmatization. The argument developed
proceeds in two steps. Firstly, the paper discloses and discusses characteristic
features of states that lead to them being labeled “rogue states.” Thereby
the paradoxical situation occurs that “rogue states” can be seen either
as a part of the international community or as an entity being excluded
from this community. Furthermore, it is emphasized that the selection
process of “rogue states” is based on biased securitization policies.
Secondly, despite being exposed to significant external pressure, most
“rogue states” have shown a remarkable resistance to transforming their
political conduct. Two main sources of strength are identified: the ability
of “rogue states” to draw material and ideational resources from the international
system and their disposal over state capacities.
“Responsible Members of the International
Community”?
Multilateral Agreements and Environmental Protection in Post-Soviet States
Amy Forster Rothbart
Post-Soviet states have attempted to demonstrate their willingness to
be good global citizens by joining multilateral environmental agreements
(MEAs). They rapidly signed on to many of these treaties without consideration
of what implementation would require. This does not necessarily mean that
the commitments are simply empty promises. International organizations
and domestic implementation constituencies strive to put the commitments
into action with mixed results. This article considers implementation
in Kazakhstan and Ukraine based on interviews with government officials
and NGO leaders in the two countries and the review of treaty-related
documents.
‘Symptoms’ of Democracy in Transdniestria
Daria Isachenko
This article examines the relationship between the dynamics of state-building
and the function of the international community in the case of Transdniestria,
the eastern region of Moldova. It looks in particular at the practices
that local authorities use in promoting Transdniestrian statehood in the
international arena. The Transdniestrian state-building project has been
characterised by virtual means such as the Internet and by simulation
that aim to produce the ‘symptoms’ of democracy in order to legitimise
the claim to statehood. It is argued that these symptoms cannot be understood
without reference to the international community, which in the case of
Transdniestria serves as a normative framework for the process of state-building
and leads to simulations of democracy in the de facto state.
Der Vertrag von Oslo über das umfassende Verbot von
Streumunition: Die „Convention on Cluster Munitions“
Detlev Justen
In December 2008 a new treaty under international law has been signed:
the “Convention on Cluster Munitions”. It bans the use, production, stockpiling
and transfer of cluster munitions and establishes a framework for cooperation
and assistance. Despite the main producer and stockpiler of this munitions
opposing the treaty it will strengthen international humanitarian law
and contribute to stigmatize the use and transfer of cluster munitions.
This article analyses the Convention’s main regulations, both its merits
and flaws, and will give an assessment on the accord’s future prospects.
Zehn Jahre auf der NATO-Agenda – Terrorismusbekämpfung
durch die Nordatlantische Allianz
Markus Kaim
After 9/11, NATO listed transnational terrorism among the major threats
of the coming decade. Since then, structural as opposed to operational
provisions remained partial, and NATO’s four anti-terrorist operations
have proven its instruments inefficient and its approaches inept. Confronted
with different actors and threats, the US and several EU-members also
perceive retaliation options differently. The NATO option took a back
seat as its strategies appeared to duplicate existing ones on other levels.
Today, coordination on ministerial levels, through an Assistant Secretary
General, or a transatlantic advising board could contribute to a new multidimensional
strategy. But success remains uncertain.
Right or wrong: Debate in Russia on Conflict in Georgia
Diana Digol
The article presents a comprehensive overview of opinions in Russia on
the August 2008 military conflict with Georgia. The positions presented
include not only those of the political elite and political opinion-makers
but also those of the cultural and social elite and of representatives
of various ethnic groups involved in the conflict. The overview concludes
by presenting results of public opinion polls. The period covered is between
the commencement of hostilities on 8 August 2008 and the end of that year.
The article is limited to Russia and does not cover the debates of neighbouring
countries.
|