Ausgabe
2-2010
Themenschwerpunkt:
Innere und äussere Sicherheit
Internal and External Security
INHALT
Editorial | download
full article as pdf
Seite III
Themenschwerpunkt:
Innere und äussere Sicherheit
Internal and External Security
Forum
- Auswahlwehrpflicht: eine zeitgemäße Weiterentwicklung der
allgemeinen Wehrpflicht?
Christian Bernzen und Christoph Bertram
Seite 110
- Eine Auswahlwehrpflicht greift zu kurz
Jürgen Groß
Seite 113
- Die allgemeine Wehrpflicht in Deutschland – zur aktuellen Debatte
um die Wehrform in unserem Land
Ulrich Kirsch Seite 115
Dokumentation
Seite 119
Neuerscheinung
Seite 122
Annotationen | download
full article as pdf
Seite 123
Besprechungen | download
full article as pdf
Seite 124

ENGLISH ABSTRACTS
The Institutional Interweaving of Internal and
External Security in Europe
Ines-Jacqueline Werkner
The term “security” has historically developed and differentiated
itself with the Peace of Westphalia and the constituting
of the modern nation-state. Security became a responsibility of the state.
As of this time, a distinction of responsibility between
internal and external security has been considered to be one of the characteristics
of the nation-state. In the field of external
security, international law has been established, whereas the internal
security is based on the respective national legal and
constitutional norms. Nevertheless, ambitions to link internal and external
security more strongly have risen since the terror
attacks of 9/11. Against the background of this controversy, current tendencies
towards an increased interweaving of internal and external security in
Europe will be surveyed and subjected to a critical analysis.
Conceptualising Non-traditional Roles and Tasks
of Armed Forces
Albrecht Schnabel and Danail Hristov
Armed forces around the world are involved in non-traditional roles and
tasks beyond their core competence of defending
the state from external threats. Evolving non-traditional tasks include
international, domestic, military and non-military ones,
both independently and subsidiary to other security institutions’
activities. Considerable variation exists across countries in the
development, scope and nature of such non-traditional roles. This article
presents a conceptual framework in order to allow
comparative analyses of evolving non-traditional roles of armed forces.
Focusing primarily on international and domestic roles
as entry points to a discussion of non-traditional roles, it further illustrates
the utility of this conceptual framework by drawing
on a number of selected armed forces in established democracies in Western
Europe, setting the stage for further analysis of the motivations, opportunities,
risks and implications of evolving non-traditional roles and tasks.
Time to be More Serious about Post-Conflict Police
Development
Alexander Mayer-Rieckh
As of 2009, over 11,000 international police officers from more than 100
countries were deployed in 18 United Nations
peace operations. Crisis management missions of the European Union also
rely heavily on international police components. Over the years, the mandates
of international police missions have widened from traditional monitoring
responsibilities to a broad array of police development and security sector
reform tasks. Yet the structures, resources and skill sets of international
police missions do not match their mandates. Only fundamental structural
changes will enable international support to post-conflict police reform
and development to deliver on the promises it has not met so far.
Wearing the Outside In: Internal Deployment of
the Armed Forces in Germany and Italy
Derek Lutterbeck
Since the end of the Cold War, many if not all, European or Western countries
have increasingly used their armed
forces for missions within the borders of the state. The aim of this article
is to compare the internal deployment of the military in
two European countries: Germany and Italy, both of which experienced authoritarian
rule and militarism in the 20th century.
However, despite similar historical experiences, there have been considerable
differences between the two countries in terms
of the roles their armed forces have come to play in addressing domestic
challenges in recent years. Indeed, they may represent opposite extremes
on a spectrum ranging from very limited to very far-reaching involvement
of military forces in internal (security) matters.
Bundeswehr im Einsatz: Erweitertes Aufgabenspektrum
und dessen Wahrnehmung im Spiegel der öffentlichen Meinung
Rüdiger Fiebig und Carsten Pietsch
This article presents findings from the annual public opinion survey on
security and defence issues, conducted by the
Bundeswehr Institute of Social Sciences. It focuses on the current and
emerging spectrum of operations of the German armed
forces engaging terrorist threats at home and abroad. Owing to its contributions
to global military operations against terrorism,
Germany has to re-evaluate its traditional military posture which is framed
by the unique setting of the German constitution,
due to its specific historic experience of 1933-1945. This article provides
an overview of the institutional background as well as
attitudes of the German population.
Der internationale Terrorismus als Herausforderung
des deutschen Strafrechts – Erwägungen zu einer Gratwanderung
Milan Kuhli
The phenomenon of terrorism makes people fear about the internal security
in Germany – a fear which results in the
demand for state reactions. This article asks to what extent criminal
law is a proper instrument with which to come to terms with the phenomenon
of terrorism. Unlike “ordinary” criminals, terrorists embrace
a system of absolute beliefs and convictions. But in democratic cultures,
such absolute beliefs and convictions are subject to the outcomes of democratic
procedures, and thus the terrorist necessarily stands outside such a culture.
Criminal law in a rule of law state fundamentally depends on communicating
with criminals – sending a message of deterrence, for example, or
of condemnation, or serving any of a number of other expressive functions.
And the question with terrorists whose views are so absolute as to be
unalterable is whether such communication is possible at all. These are
practical limits to the use of criminal law as an instrument with which
to deal with terrorism, but there are also normative limits, which are
discussed in this article as well.
|